![]() ![]() This is a close call that reasonable people can differ on. ![]() I’d like to see a cooling down of some of the rhetoric about how obviously crooked the book is or what a thieving cheat the player is, or this increasingly common kneejerk reaction that if a moderator or someone associated with SBR expresses an opinion favorable to a book it proves the site is a bunch of useless whores in the pocket of the sportsbooks. Most of the points and questions that have been raised are either irrelevant or I think I know where I’d side on them, but the remaining one that seems important to me that I only have a lean at most on is “Can a player of the degree of ‘sharpness’ that this player is, be reasonably obligated to interpret the account note and the software behavior to mean that he had $500/no dupe limits not only in the sportsbook but in the racebook and other separate but affiliated areas of the website as well?”īut anyway, I don’t agree with the many on both sides who are vehement that the other side is just outrageously wrong. ![]() My position is probably closest to what JC said. I think the player should be paid, but it’s not a slam dunk either way for me. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |